ORGANIZATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CREATIVITY POTENTIAL IN THE COMPETITIVENESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2022.3.14.25Keywords:
intellectual capital, structural capital, innovation, environment of creativity, heterarchy, organizational interaction, synergy of diversityAbstract
The article specifies the main directions of innovative changes in business models and business processes of domestic industrial corporations in order to preserve their ability to enter global chains of consumer value creation during the recovery period. According to modern views on the significance of individual components of intellectual capital in the formation of the competitiveness of business entities, creativity is highlighted in their totality, the author's interpretation of the potential of creativity is proposed, and its place in the management system of the competitiveness of an industrial company is determined. The creativity potential of an economic organization is proposed to be considered as its ability to accumulate the necessary amount of intellectual resources for generating creative (non-standard) ideas sufficient for the formation of an effective business model of economic activity in the current and strategically forecasted business environment, while showing creativity in the development of structural capital and relationship capital. It is argued that the organizational and structural conditions for realizing the creative potential of industrial corporations are radical decentralization of management, which is built on the principles of heterarchical organizational structuring. Based on a comparison of the characteristics of organizational "hierarchy" and "heterarchy", their fundamental differences in management approaches are illustrated. The peculiarities of heterarchy as an effective form of increasing the potential of creativity and forming an environment of active innovative search in the organizational shell of corporate and other integrated structures are highlighted.
References
Taranenko I. (2013). Modyfikatsiia hlobalizatsiino-innovatsiinoi modeli svitovoi ekonomiky na zasadakh staloho rozvytku: novi vymiry konkurentospromozhnosti. Yevropeiskyi vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku.. Vyp. 1(12). S. 172–185.
Zos-Kior M.V., Bryzhan K.O. (2017). Upravlinnia konkurentospromozhnistiu pidpryiemstva v umovakh nestabilnosti. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal «Internauka». Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky». № 6. S.62-65.
Zaitseva L.O. (2018). Konkurentospromozhnist pidpryiemstva: teoretychnyi aspekt upravlinnia: monohrafiia. Starobilsk: DZ LNU imeni T.Shevchenka, 235 s.
Vakulenko Yu.V., Oliinyk A.S. and Gevlenko O.E. (2018). Systemna kharakterystyka upravlinnja konkurentospromozhnistju pidpryiemstva. Ahrosvit, vol. 18, pp. 10-15. DOI: 10.32702/23066792.2018.18.10.
Holovchuk Yu.O., Pchelianska H.O. (2020). Osoblyvosti formuvannia stratehii pidvyshchennia konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva na osnovi paradyhmy innovatsiinoho rozvytku. Ekonomika ta derzhava. №3. S.66-70.
Stadnyk V., Sokoliuk G., Goncharuk A., Matviiets O. (2019). Institutional factors of competitiveness and development of the national economy. Advances in economics, business and management research. Vol. 99. Pp. 376–380. https://doi.org/10.2991/mdsmes-19.2019.71.
Spivak S. (2020). Menedzhment konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv: teoriia, metodyka, praktyka: monohrafiia Ternopil: FOP Palianytsia V.A.
Khrapkina V.V. (2020). Upravlinnja konkurentospromozhnistju pidpryiemstva. Prychornomors'ki ekonomichni studii, vol. 50, pp. 245—248.
Shulha M. (2020). Rozroblennia napriamiv pidvyshchennia konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva. Pidpryiemnytstvo ta innovatsii.. №12. S. 135-141.
Berezina L.M., Varaksina O.V., Oliinyk A.S., Rak А.H. (2021). Teoretyko-metodolohichni osnovy upravlinnia konkurentospromozhnistiu pidpryiemstva. Ahrosvit, № 21-22. S.35-42.
Porter M. E. (1990). Competitive Advantage of Nation. New York: Free Press.
Stadnyk V.V., Zamaziy O.V. (2015). Innovative factors in the system of value-based management of an industrial enterprise. Actual problems of economics. No. 9. Pp. 242-249.
Stadnyk V.V., Sokoliuk G.O., Hryzovska L.O. (2020). Informatsiinyi menedzhment u realizatsii potentsialu kreatyvnosti y riznomanitnosti subiektiv industrii hostynnosti. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic sciences. № 2. S.155-160.
Stratehichni vyklyky ХХI stolittia suspilstvu ta ekonomitsi Ukrainy : v 3 t.; [za red. V. M. Heietsia, V. P. Semynozhenka, B. Ie. Kvasniuka]. T. 3: Konkurentospromozhnist ukrainskoi ekonomiky ( 2007). Kyiv : Feniks.
Nauka, tekhnolohii ta innovatsii. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2005 /ni/ind_rik/ind_u /2002.html (data zvernennja 21. 08.2022).
Obsiah realizovanoi innovatsiinoi produktsii (tovariv, posluh) za vydamy ekonomichnoi diialnosti. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (data zvernennja 21.08.2022)
Obsiah realizovanoi promyslovoi produktsii (tovariv, posluh) za vydamy ekonomichnoi diialnosti u 2010-2020 rokakh. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (data zvernennja 21.08.2022).
Khamel H., Prakhalad K. (2002). Konkuryruia za budushchee. Sozdanye rynkov zavtrashneho dnia. Moskva: Olymp-Byznes.
Wernerfelt B. (1995). The Resours-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years Later. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 16, № 3. P.171-174.
Williamson O. E. (1985).The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free press: New York.
Аzojev G.L., Chelenkov А.P. (2000). Коnkurentnyje preimushchestva firmy. Моskva: ОАО «Тipographija «NOVOSTI». 256 s.
Stark D. (2001). Neodnoznachnost aktyvov y orhanyzatsyia raznoobrazyia v postsotsyalystycheskykh stranakh. Ekonomycheskaia sotsyolohyia. № 2, t.2. S. 115-129.
Fontana W., Buss L.W. (1994). The Arrival of the Fittest: Toward a Theory of Biological Organization. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. № 56(1). Pp. 1-64.
Stan naukovo-innovatsiinoi diialnosti v Ukraini u 2020 rotsi : naukovo-analitychna zapyska / T.V. Pysarenko, T.K. Kuranda, T.K. Kvasha ta in. Kyiv: UkrINTEI, 2021. 39 s. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/2021/06/23/AZ.nauka.innovatsiyi.2020.
Stadnyk V.V. (2015). Heterarkhiia yak orhanizatsiina obolonka efektyvnoi vzaiemodii riznomanitnostei u zabezpechenni konkurentospromozhnosti suchasnykh korporatsii Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic sciences. № 6. S.132-137.
