DIAGNOSTICS OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY EFFECTIVENESS OF BUSINESS STRUCTURES AT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-CRISIS MANAGEMENT POLICY CONDITIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2021.1.28.39Keywords:
diagnostics, innovative activity, business structures, anti-crisis managementAbstract
The author's approach to diagnostics of innovative activity effectiveness of business structures at the implementation of anti-crisis management policy conditions is offered in the article. The main approaches to the sequence of assessment of the innovative activity effectiveness of business structures are summarized and the key aspects that reveal the modern methodological tools of this process are identified. The author's vision of the stages of diagnostics of innovative activity effectiveness of business structures at the implementation of anti-crisis management policy conditions (1) methodological support of the diagnostic process; 2) information support; 3) development of a comprehensive integrated indicator; 4) the assessment process; 5) development of anti-crisis measures) is formed. The main methodological approaches to the selection of the components of the systems for assessment of the innovative activity effectiveness of business structures are systematized and the following are distinguished: functional approach, modified-functional, resource, resource-functional and other approach. The basic requirements which the system of indicators of the innovative activity effectiveness of business structures should satisfy are defined. It is proposed to build a system of indicators on the principle of dualism and to distinguish two parts: general and special. It is proved that the indicators of the general part should be based on the basic principles of anti-crisis management and priorities of inclusive economic development and be divided into social, economic, environmental, scientific, technical and organizational blocks. Indicators of the special part are aimed at diagnosing specific industry and structural features of business structures. Based on the proposed system of indicators, it is advisable to form a comprehensive integrated indicator that will determine the level of the innovative activity effectiveness of business structures (low, medium, high) and develop a set of anti-crisis measures to improve it and meet the main priorities of inclusive economic development and social responsibility of innovators.
References
Volkov O. I., Denisenko M. P. (Eds.). (2004) Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia innovatsiinoi diialnosti [Economics and organization of innovation]. Kyiv: Professional.
Chorna, M. V., Glukhova, S. V. (2012) Otsinka efektyvnosti innovatsiy̆noï diialnosti pidpryiemstv [Evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative activities of enterprises: monograph]. Kharkiv: KhDUHT.
Koyuda V. O., Lysenko L. A. (2010) Innovatsiy̆na diialnist pidpryiemstva ta otsinka ïï efektyvnosti [Innovative activity of the enterprise and evaluation of its efficiency: monograph]. Kharkiv: INZHEK, 224 p.
Mikityuk P. P. (2007) Analiz vplyvu investytsiy̆ ta innovatsiy̆ na efektyvnist hospodarskoï diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Analysis of the impact of investments and innovations on the efficiency of economic activity of the enterprise]. Ternopil: Economic Thought, 295 p.
Gritsulenko S. I. (2016) Otsinka innovatsiinoi diialnosti yak instrument innovatsiinoi polityky hospodarskoi systemy [Evaluation of innovation as a tool of innovation policy of the economic system]. Efficient economy. № 3. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4831.
Khariv P. S. (2003). Innovatsiy̆na diialnist pidpryiemstva ta ekonomichna otsinka innovatsiy̆nykh protsesiv: Monohrafiia [Innovative activity of the enterprise and economic estimation of innovative processes: monograph]. Ternopil: Economic Thought.
Ishcheikin T. E. (2011) Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky innovatsiy̆noho rozvytku torhovelnykh pidpryiemstv [Methodical approaches to the assessment of innovative development of trade enterprises]. Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade, vol. 5 (50), pp. 259-267.
Chernov V. A. (2004) Analiz innovacionnoĭ dejatel'nosti v torgovle. [Analysis of innovation in trade]. Audit and financial analysis, vol. 1, pp. 46-49.
Trifilova A. A. (2005). Ocenka jeffektivnosti innovacionnogo razvitija predprijatija [Evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative development of the enterprise]. Moscow: Finance and Statistics.
Ilysheva N. N., Ilyshev A. M. (2004). Sistema analiticheskih pokazateleĭ innovacionnoĭ dejatel'nosti organizacii [System of analytical indicators of innovative activity of the organization] Quality. Innovations. Education, vol. 2, pp. 26-30.
Methodical recommendations for tracking the dynamics of the main economic indicators of strategically important enterprises and monopoly enterprises (based on individual monitoring of enterprises). (2004). Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine. URL: http://www.me.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article? art_id = 37880 & cat_id = 38738.
Gadzevych O., Matviychuk I. (2017). Metodyka analizu ta otsinky innovatsiy̆noï diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Methods of analysis and evaluation of innovative activities of the enterprise]. Economic Journal of the Lesia Ukrainka East European National University, vol. 3, pp. 100-106.
Voloshchuk L. O., Kirsanova V. V., Filyppova S. V. (2014). Analitychni instrumenty upravlinnia innovatsiy̆nym rozvytkom promyslovoho pidpryiemstva : Monohrafiia [Analytical tools for managing the innovative development of an industrial enterprise: monograph]. Odessa: ONPU; CADE.
Voloshchuk L. O. (2014) Innovatsiinyi rozvytok promyslovoho pidpryiemstva: sutnist ta problemy analitychnoho zabezpechennia v umovakh indykatyvnoho upravilinnia [Innovative development of an industrial enterprise: essence and problems of analytical support in the conditions of indicative management]. Business inform, vol.11, pp. 75-79.
Kadol L. V. (2016) Osoblyvosti kompleksnoï otsinky efektyvnosti innovatsiy̆noï diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Features of a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of innovative activities of the enterprise]. Global and national economic problems, vol. 10, pp. 359–363.
Koyuda P. M., Sheiko I. A. (2013). Effektyvnist innovatsiy̆noï diialnosti pidpryiemstv: teoriia ta praktyka: Monohrafiia [Efficiency of innovative activity of enterprises: theory and practice: monograph]. Kharkiv: KNURE.
Frolova L., Zhadko K., Ilyash O., Yermak S., Nosova T. (2021). Model for opportunities assessment to increase the enterprise innovation activity. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), pp.1-11.
Break P. G., Kosenko A. P. (2006). Razvytye metodov otsenky эffektyvnosty yspolzovanyia ynnovatsyonnoho potentsyala [Development of methods for assessing the effectiveness of the use of innovation potential]. Bulletin of the East Ukrainian National University, vol. 4, pp. 178–187.
Zianko V. V., Yepifanova I. Y., Zianko V. V. (2015) Innovatsiy̆na diialnist pidpryiemstv ta ïï finansove zabezpechennia v umovakh trancformatsiy̆nykh zmin ekonomiky Ukraïny : Monohrafiia [Innovative activity of enterprises and its financial support in the conditions of transformational changes of economy of Ukraine: monograph]. Vinnytsia: UNIVERSUM-Vinnytsia.
Yermak S. O. (2019) Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady stratehichnoho upravlinnia inkliuzyvnym rozvytkom innovatsiinoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv [Theoretical and methodological basis of strategic management of inclusive development of enterprises innovative activity: monograph]. Schweinfurt, Germany: Time Realities Scientific Group UG (haftungsbeschränkt.
Yermak S. (2017) Problems of innovative activity development at food industry enterprises of Ukraine. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, vol. 21, pp. 96-102.
Malyuta L.Ya. (2011) Assessing the level of innovative development of an industrial enterprise. Socio-economic problems and the state, vol. 1 (4). URL: http://sepd.tntu.edu.ua/images/stories/pdf/2011/11mlyrpp.pdf.
Dzhedzhula V., Yepifanova I., Tsvyk A. (2017) Innovatsiina diialnist yak chynnyk konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv [Innovative activity as a factor of competitiveness of enterprises]. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, vol. 4, pp. 5–8.
Demchenko G. V. (2016) Rozrobka modeli otsinky ta systemy pokaznykiv orhanizatsiy̆noho zabezpechennia aktyvizatsiï innovatsiy̆noï diialnosti [Development of an evaluation model and a system of indicators of organizational support for the intensification of innovation]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, vol. 9, pp. 42–45.
Gustinsky M. O. (2011). Metodychni zasady otsinky efektyvnosti innovatsiy̆noï diialnosti v haluziakh narodnoho hospodarstva [Methodical bases of an estimation of efficiency of innovative activity in branches of a national economy]. Scientific works of Poltava State Agrarian Academy. Series: Economic Sciences, vol. 2, is. 1, pp. 88-92.
Filyppova S., Bashynska I., Kholod B., Prodanova L., Ivanchenkova L., Ivanchenkov V. (2019). Risk management through systematization: Risk Management Culture. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8 (3), pp. 6047-6052.
Bashinskaya, I.O. (2019). SMART-pidkhid do vyznachennia tsilei smartyzatsii promyslovoho pidpryiemstva [SMART-approach to defining the goals of industrial enterprise smartization]. Scientific notes of TNU named after V.I. Vernadsky. Series: Economics and Management, vol.5, is. 30 (69), pp. 41-46.
