PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPLEMENTATION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DOMESTIC BANKING SECTOR)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2023.4.98.107

Keywords:

banks, stakeholders, banking sector, corporate social responsibility (CSR), responsible banking, Sustainable Development Goals, CSR practices, CSR vectors

Abstract

In modern economics, both at the global and national level, there is a paradigm shift from exclusively market values to the values of socio-economic development, which prompts businesses to take into account the principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR), which represents a voluntary response to social problems, the fulfillment of moral and ethical requirements formed by society. Companies, realizing the advantages of a socially proactive position, are increasingly involved in solving social and environmental problems on a systemic basis, thereby strengthening their own reputation and positive image. This is especially relevant for banking institutions that are characterized by unstable functioning. The profitability of banks today is determined not only by their technological level in terms of providing services, however increasingly by their "profile" in the social environment, the foundation of which is reputation and compliance with the principles of social responsibility, which, at the same time, play the role of triggers in the formation of the foundation of trust in banking institutions. According to the results of the research, it was found that CSR practices implemented by Ukrainian banks are generally aimed at integrating the principles of social responsibility into corporate policy and the strategy of social investment growth in accordance with the interests of both internal and external stakeholders. Despite the fact that socially responsible business in the domestic banking sector is characterized by multifaceted implementation directions, banks generally use social and environmental CSR models, which mostly reflect the types of social support. The largest banks resort to a variable approach in the implementation of CSR initiatives that have an impact on various aspects of society. Other banks tend to use either an extensive system of corporate social responsibility, or choose one line of work, implementing it in full. CSR in the domestic banking sector is currently in its infancy, as its implementation requires business excellence and targeted balance.

References

Bowen H. (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row. N.Y.

Davis K. (1960) Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, p. 70

Davis K. (1967) Understanding the social responsibility puzzle: what does the businessman owe to society. Business Horizons. Vol. 10 (4), pp. 46-47

Ackerman R. W. (1973) How companies respond to social demands. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 51(4), pp. 88-89

Sethi, S. P. (1975) Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17(3), pp. 58-64

Frederick W. C. (1978) 1994. From CSR-1 to CSR-2: the maturing of business-and-society thought, pp. 154-155

Carroll A. B. (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 4(4)

Carroll A. B. (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons. Vol. 34(4), p. 43

Wood, D. J. (1991) Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16, pp. 691-718

Schwartz M. (2003) Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly. Vol. 13(4), p. 509

Wood, D., Logsdon J. (2002) Business Citizenship: From Individuals to Organizations, in R. Edward Freeman and Sankaran Venkataraman (eds), Ethics and Entreprerieurship, The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics, 3, 59-94

Suprun N. A (2009) Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist yak chynnyk staloho rozvytku. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia. № 3. S. 61-74. URL: http://eip.org.ua/docs/EP_09_3_61_uk.pdf

Hrishnova O. (2010) Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: sutnist, znachennia, stratehichni napriamy rozvytku v Ukraini. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi. №7. S. 3-8. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Uap_2010_7_3

Kolot A. M. (2013) Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist: evoliutsiia ta rozvytok teoretychnykh pohliadiv. Ekonomichna teoriia. № 4. S. 5-26

Zinchenko A., Saprykina M. (2017) Rozvytok KSV v Ukraini: 2010-2018. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo «Iuston», 52 s.

Osnovna statystyka korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti u 2023 rotsi. URL: https://zipdo.co/statistics/corporate-social-responsibility/

Principles for Responsible Banking. URL: https://www.unepfi.org/banking/bankingprinciples/

Pasinovych I. I., Sych O. A. (2022) Rozvytok korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti bankiv v Ukraini v konteksti staloho rozvytku. Intelekt KhKhI. №2. S. 43-50

UKRSIBBANK onovyv KSV-polityky, yaki rehuliuiut vzaiemodiiu z chutlyvymy sektoramy ekonomiky. URL: https://ukrsibbank.com/news-post/ukrsibbank-onoviv-ksv-politiki-yaki-regulyuyut-vzaemodiyu-z-chutlivimi-sektorami-ekonomiki/

Ilchenko-Siuiva L. V., Sliusarchuk O. P. (2019) Sotsialno vidpovidalna investytsiina diialnist yak chynnyk staloho rozvytku. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid. № 10. S. 109-114

Kuznietsov V. KSV voiennoho chasu. Top-10 kompanii. URL: https://www.dsnews.ua/ukr/reitingi/ksv-voyennogo-chasu-top-10-kompaniy-22122022-471409

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Shymanska О., & Hdal І. (2023). PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPLEMENTATION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DOMESTIC BANKING SECTOR). Innovation and Sustainability, (4), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2023.4.98.107

Issue

Section

Articles

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.