JUSTIFICATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF STAKEHOLDERS’ SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS ON THE CHOICE OF PROJECTS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENTERPRISE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2022.4.8.21Keywords:
sustainable development, enterprise, stakeholder, project selection, project managementAbstract
The paper provides reasons for considering sustainable development paradigm as the most efficient and effective way for Ukrainian enterprises to achieve goals of post-war revitalization fast. Furthermore, the study substantiates that the sustainable development of enterprises, which is corporate sustainable development uniting corporate social accountability and shared social responsibility, in the conditions of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine can be ensured on the basis of achieving a balance between the interests of stakeholders and the company's ability to implement sustainable development projects. In order to provide corporate sustainable development, the study offers distinguishing three types of stakeholders: those who do economic pressures towards enterprise, those who do social pressure and those who do environmental pressures on corporate management. It is proposed to determine the group common interest of the company's stakeholders, expressed in terms of the benefits they want to receive and the contributions they are ready to make to sustainable development projects, using the method of cluster analysis. It has been proven that the subjective assessments of stakeholders regarding the value of any sustainable development project for them influence the choice of the final project of sustainable development that corresponds to the capabilities of the enterprise. This is due to the property of discreteness of the amounts of benefits and contributions to the projects of sustainable development of the enterprise, with the help of which the group common interest of stakeholders is set. The process of comparing sustainable development projects that represent the interests of stakeholders with projects that meet the company's capabilities is shown, and the scientific and practical task of choosing the final project based on the balance of stakeholders' interests and the company's capabilities is described. The stages of ensuring the sustainable development of the enterprise on the basis of taking into account the interests of stakeholders during the implementation of projects in the social, economic and environmental spheres are analyzed. It is substantiated that it is advisable to solve the task of choosing projects of sustainable development of the enterprise under the influence of subjective assessments of stakeholders using the method of fuzzy sets. Creating fuzzy variables connected to stakeholders’ assessments of endeavors allows managers of enterprises to ensure sustainable development project selection considering stakeholders’ subjective impact factor
References
Kostyrko, L., Kostyrko, R., Sereda, O., & Chernodubova, E. (2021). Finansove zabezpechennya stalogo rozvytku pidpryyemstv v umovah ekonomiko-ekologichnyh imperatyv [Financial support for the sustainable development of enterprises in the conditions of economic and environmental imperatives]. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(39), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i39.241295.
Berezyanko, T., Kostrycya, O., & Doroshenko, V. (2022). Finansovyj ryzyk pry formuvanni strategiyi stalogo rozvytku pidpryyemstva [Financial risk in the formation of the strategy of sustainable development of the enterprise]. Ekonomika ta suspil`stvo, (35). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-35-1.
Glukhova, V. and Kravchenko, K. (2022), [Environmental finances of Ukraine in conditions of sustainable development[, Efektyvna ekonomika, [Online], vol. 5, available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=10276 (Accessed 25 Oct 2022). DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2022.5.72.
Reverchuk, S. and Tvorydlo, O. (2022), [Formation of socially-oriented financial business in Ukraine[, Efektyvna ekonomika, [Online], vol. 5, available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=10270 (Accessed 25 Oct 2022). DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2022.5.1.
Voron`ko-Nevidnycha, T., Koval`, O., & Koloda, O. (2021). Upravlinnya rozvytkom pidpryyemstva yak neobxidna umova dosyagnennya cilej stalogo rozvytku [Enterprise development management as a necessary condition for achieving the goals of sustainable development]. Ekonomika ta suspil`stvo, (25). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-25-80.
Pogorelov Yu. S., Kozachenko G. V. Instrumentarij stalogo rozvytku pidpryyemstva v umovax kryzy [Tools for sustainable development of the enterprise in crisis conditions]. Biznes Inform. 2021. №4. C. 285–293. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-4-285-293.
Xrynyuk, O., & Ocheretyana, O. (2021). Faktory vynyknennya kryzovyh yavyshh ta zabezpechennya stalogo rozvytku pidpryyemstva [Factors of occurrence of crisis phenomena and ensuring sustainable development of the enterprise]. Ekonomika ta suspil`stvo, (26). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-26-47.
Duns`ka A. R., Bondarenko O. A. Upravlinnya stalym rozvytkom pidpryyemstv oboronno-promyslovogo kompleksu Ukrayiny [Management of the sustainable development of enterprises of the defense-industrial complex of Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta derzhava. 2021. № 12. С. 23–29. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6806.2021.12.23.
Zagorecz`ka, O., Danylovych, T., & Petrushka, T. (2022). Rozvytok malogo ekobiznesu u sferi rozvag na zasadax stalogo rozvytku [Development of small eco-business in the field of entertainment on the basis of sustainable development]. Ekonomika ta suspil`stvo, (40). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-40-45.
Vieira Nunhes, T., Viviani Garcia, E., Espuny, M., Homem de Mello Santos, V., Isaksson, R., & José de Oliveira, O. (2021). Where to go with corporate sustain-ability? Opening paths for sustainable businesses through the collaboration between universities, governments, and organizations. Sustainability, 13(3), 1429.
Ali, A., Jiang, X., & Ali, A. (2022). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Organizational learning, social ties, and environmental strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1– 16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3184.
Kowalska, M. Conceptualization of Sustainable Marketing Tools among SME Managers in Selected Countries in Poland and Sri Lanka. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106172.
Masud, M.A.K.; Rahman, M.; Rashid, M.H.U. Anti-Corruption Disclosure, Corporate Social Expenditure and Political Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106140.
Qaderi, S.A.; Ghaleb, B.A.A.; Hashed, A.A.; Chandren, S.; Abdullah, Z. Board Characteristics and Integrated Reporting Strategy: Does Sustainability Committee Matter? Sustainability 2022, 14, 6092. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106092.
Suriyankietkaew, S.; Krittayaruangroj, K.; Iamsawan, N. Sustainable Leadership Practices and Competencies of SMEs for Sustainability and Resilience: A Community-Based Social Enterprise Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105762
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Innovation and Sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
